include Conn O’Muineachain. I told him I’d been depressed for over a year and that I’m well now. He said he liked my question to Andrew Keen. That was good to hear because even thought my main reference point for whether my action is good lies deep within my self, I still value what others think. If he’d said that was a rubbish question, I’d have taken that as telling me something new about him.
Eoin Purcell, Mercier Press I met too. Great to run into him because I ran a training course on strategic planning in about October 2007, after I got depressed. First met him there. It was good to tell him about my depression because I was bothered by whether I’d been awful that day. Explaining how I was now better, and asking him if he’d like to meet up for coffee in Cork, helped me too.
Otherwise, I met a pleasant guy from UCD who teaches on the MBA course there. He’s dipping his toes into the blogging water. I offered to help him if he wanted another sounding board.
Next, I’m at the workshop "New Media in Practice". Most of the people here, about 100, are bloggers. A small number of ‘twitters’. Lots of ‘Facebook’.
"Anyone live-blogging here?" asked Eoin Purcell.
One, yours truely…
On this panel: Conn O Muineachain (New Media Specialist and Blogger)
Sheila de Courcy (Head of Young People’s Programming RTE)
She’s speaking now:
text doesn’t work for youngsters
they like being first, so they can show their friends
something slightly different and strong
four different age groups
know your audience.
Maura McHugh (writer and blogger) talks about what she does. Her remit is to deliver a limited range of info to members. (What members?) Newsletter email as well as the blog. There are writers who don’t use computers. ‘Text is dead’ is not right. A lot of places pay authors for their work. Social networking sites can be very good. Electronic submissions make it easier these days. You used to be a loca artist. Now you can relate to a much wider arena.
Nicky Gogan (Film maker, Darklight Film Festival) talking about a model of collaboration between teenagers: videos on U-Tube. We pick the ones we like - we go run workshops for them. The final ten films are there now.
Why isn’t there a lot more engagement with us the audience. We seem to be using the most traditional model of relationship between panel and particiapants. Now we view a funny film probably made by teenagers. Funny. Laughs in the audience. A spoof programme. Good fun. Light relief. We need it because this is so wordy. The panel of 4 go on and get to talk. What are we to do sitting here. At least I have this tool for screaming out how much better this could be. The audience sits here, translating everything into its frames of reference. We are incredibly active as listeners. But we are treated as passive.
Eoin turns and brings the audience in. Thank goodness. But we are quickly into question and answer mode. Question followed by another long panel spiel. I’, being very critical but I do know they are doing their best - within an ancient paradigm.
You’re clearly at the wrong conference. So - you’re a blogger - big deal. Most of us here aren’t and are here to learn from what is going on around us - what’s so wrong with wanting to give time and attention to people who are doing this work - people who might teach or lead us? Your attack on Andrew Keen from the floor was utterly disrespectful - ask a question - like or dislike his response - but the cynicism and sarcasm of your retort was sad. If you’ve nothing to gain and are only looking for negative blog fodder perhaps consider leaving and letting your invective lose elsewhere.
Comment by angela — November 25, 2008 @ 1:50 pm
I’m the UCD guy. Though I’m not in any official capacity being a part-time adjunct faculty member.
Thanks for all the blogging - especially the parallel sessions I wasn’t on.
I’m not sure what your “attack” on Andrew Keen from the floor was (I was there don’t remember an attack). Think some good exchange of views and someone who describes themselves as “the antichrist of silicon valley” as Andrew does is well able for that. In fact I think thats mild by his standards.
I think your passion and enthuaism is mistaken for criticism.
Comment by dermot — November 25, 2008 @ 7:57 pm
I thought the panel was a bit staid I have to agree! For a first time panel chair I learned two things:
1) Limit all contributions
2) be ruthless
if I ever get a panel again I’ll keep all panel offerings limited and try and get audience engagement more front and centre. I think the room livened towards the end and your contribution was a welcome one! It was good to see you again!
Eoin
Comment by Eoin Purcell — November 26, 2008 @ 2:47 pm
The beauty of blogging: the co-existence of competing visions, analyses, and styles… I am a bit relieved to have a counter-balance to your view Angela, but, more importantly than that, you’ve given me a great feel for what was going on under the surface of the conference: people were feeling all sorts of emotions. You wanted me out, I think - though you didn’t exactly say that. “If you’ve nothing to gain …” : that’s a huge “if”. I had plenty to gain and I was intent on making that judgement minute by minute. In other words, I was a volunteer attendee - could have left at any time. I wonder what lies behind your strength of expression? But that’s the curious in me. I’m not asking you to say what it was.
Eoin,
Thank you very much. It’s good to be understood. It’s also great to see your reflective practice in operation. I was so pleased to meet up with you again, after that memorably miserable year I’ve had. I’ve just registered on “Twitter”. Do you use it? I haven’t a clue how to.
Comment by omaniblog — November 26, 2008 @ 9:28 pm
Hi, I’m going through your posts (but it’s getting late and I’m tired) I think it was a great idea to blog live (but people have to read it in that context) Don’t tidy it up later. I take your point about the panel versus the audience. There could have been a lot more participation. The level of exposure in the delegates was very mixed but I did wonder at the start what the arts council wanted to get out of the large amount of tax payers money the conference cost.
Comment by Emerging Writer — November 27, 2008 @ 12:13 am